A Few Thoughts on Becoming Getable

7 months ago (to the day, as a matter of fact), I asked Craig Shapiro of Collaborative Fund for an introduction to the team at Rentcycle. Block texted below are the first lines from the CV I sent to CEO Tim Hyer.

Objective

I’m looking to join the anti-Sky Mall: a collaborative consumption startup that leverages the power of the Web to transform the way people view ownership and possession..I have experience in all areas of running a company, from sales to marketing to project management; I want to use that wide base of knowledge to focus on business development for a startup looking to change the world.

Last week, we became Getable. This new brand empowers people to “Own less. Do more.”. It’s a simple, solid mission statement, and one more eloquent than I could ever have hoped to come up with. Every time I write those four words, a jolt runs up my spine, and I almost have to pinch myself as I contemplate the scope of what we’re trying to accomplish. The last sentence of my CV objective suddenly seems very, very real.

Some day, I’ll write an “X months into working at a startup” post; I think my experience here, filled with peaks and valleys, would lend valuable insight to anyone looking to break into the tech scene. But for now, I’m concentrating on the future, rather than the past. Our team is cranking away at the opportunity of a lifetime, and I couldn’t be more proud to be a part of Getable.

Check out Tim’s blog post on Becoming Getable for more insight.

Malthus and #Collcons: Population v. Technology

I remember very little from my senior year of high school. I remember even less from AP Environmental Science, first period (when I showed up).

Just one story sticks in my mind. I’ll set the scene for you.

The year is 1798. America is barely a generation old, and madness reigns in a French Republic soaked in blood. Forget Facebook’s IPO; the big news in technology is the invention of Eli Whitney’s cotton gin.

An English Reverend broods over the future of mankind from the storied halls of Oxford. He sees two lines, both arcing ever upward without pause. One tracks human population, and the other the earth’s ability to provide the resources necessary to sustain this unchecked growth. He comes to a determination: the latter simply cannot keep pace with the former.

From Thomas Malthus’s An Essay on the Principle of Population:

Must it not then be acknowledged by an attentive examiner of the histories of mankind, that in every age and in every State in which man has existed, or does now exist
That the increase of population is necessarily limited by the means of subsistence,
That population does invariably increase when the means of subsistence increase, and,
That the superior power of population is repressed, and the actual population kept equal to the means of subsistence, by misery and vice.

A “population kept equal to the means of subsistence, by misery and vice”; does this sound like a world in which you want to live? So there you have it: a never-ending struggle between population and resources. Note that the first is variable; the second is inevitably fixed.

Economists predicted that this conflict would come to a head in the 1960s, with the US Baby Boom and the explosion of population across Europe’s former colonies; it was avoided only by the Green Revolution’s rapid advancement of genetically modified crops and nitrogen-based fertilizer. Just barely, technology staved off starvation.

Fast forward to 2012, and we face a similar precipice. Global warming is a reality, the Gulf Coast is soaked in oil, and our “build build build” economic model is clearly broken.

It’s not all gloom and doom, however; once again, technology could offer a temporary reprieve. Easy connectivity via the Internet (specifically mobile, it would seem) enables Collaborative Consumption platforms, and the spread of the Sharing Economy. The potential for the efficient utilization of resources is simply enormous, and currently not quantified.

If ridesharing is the norm, instead of the exception, perhaps electric vehicles become an economic reality? If access over ownership is the norm, instead of the exception, perhaps we can find satisfaction with what we need, rather than what we want?

I’m hopeful. It’s a new frontier. Will we embrace it in time?

Thoughts on Minimalism and Collaborative Consumption

Every once in a while, I like to take a sabbatical from things. These self-imposed bouts of minimalism have shaped my relationship with items. A teenage summer adventure riding the Greyhound and hitchhiking through the Western United States and Canada, punctuated by a 230 mile, 20 day backpack through the Sierra Nevada mountains of California. A winter spent pedaling a touring bicycle up and down the rolling hills of New Zealand, cooking and camping gear, clothing and other essentials jammed into four backpack-sized panniers.

Shrinking your life inventory to carry-on size and transporting it under your own power will give you a new perspective on what’s needed and what’s not.

Then I come home. On the American scale of consumption, I’m pretty middle of the road. Apart from a couple of big-ticket items (pickup truck, motorcycle) and a pretty stacked collection of sports gear, I live a pretty simple existence. My auto-recurring Amazon Prime membership goes to waste: my only order since moving to San Francisco was for a pack of black socks and a cassette of Mach 3 razors. The guys at work make fun of my wardrobe repeats, the function of a limited closet; if I ever need a suit for work, I’ll have to go all meta on you and rent it through Rentcycle. I live in a bare room in an otherwise furnished apartment; girls are generally unimpressed when they see that I sleep on an Aerobed, which sits next to a nightstand I found on the corner of Page and Brodrick.

I credit the experiences above for informing my relationship with items. I look around, though, and realize that this “less is more” approach won’t work for everyone. We’ve been painted an illusory picture, where the average American thinks he or she can purchase his or her way to happiness. It’s bullshit, but what we’re left with after one hundred years of clever marketing (Happy Meals!), planned obsolecense (iPhone 4, iPhone 4S), and cheap credit (McMansion Expansion).

As a concept, minimalism is awesome. In practice, I don’t think it can affect change on the scale needed to save a rapidly warming world that’s running out of space for more landfills. What has been giveth, cannot so easily be taketh away.Do you want to be the one to explain to Joe from Muncie, Indiana that nirvana is to be found in cleansing himself of the items he’s worked his whole life to accumulate?

Now contrast that conversation with introducing Joe to the possibilities of Collaborative Consumption. A Tesla electric sports car shared via Getaround. Paintings borrowed from Artsicle. A power washer rented through Rentcycle. Now you’re talking about giving Joe more, rather than taking anything away.

I’m damn proud to say that, through my work at Rentcycle, I stand at the forefront of the Access Economy. I’ve invested time, money, and passion into making Collaborative Consumption the basis of the 21st century economy, so I’ll just come out and say it: I don’t want minimalism to be a part of that conversation. For this thing to work, I believe the focus needs to be on offering people more, rather than demanding that they live with less. For true, widespread adoption, the core message cannot be one of sacrifice.

Collaborative Consumption: The Answer for Occupy?

Across America and around the world, the self-proclaimed 99% occupy parks and civic centers, facing the uncertain prospect of a forced eviction that could come at any moment. Whatever your politics, it’s difficult to remain impartial as videos of pepper-sprayings proliferate on YouTube, and the New York Times publishes a former Poet Laureate’s account of his wife’s beating at the baton of a Berkeley police officer. What the hell is happening here?

I respect these people’s courage, but I’m somewhat discouraged by the movement, taken on the whole. MLK was hell-bent equal rights for African-Americans; Gandhi was determined to banish the British from the continent; Mandela fought to force the integration of a country and the end of Apartheid. These movements gave us powerful moments in history: the end of Jim Crow, lynchings, and school integration; a bloody but history-altering Partition; a black man taking the oath at a swearing-in ceremony that would have been unthinkable a decade earlier.

What would this moment look like for Occupy? A headline announcing the financially unsustainable capping of Wall Street salaries? Economically unviable legislation giving underwater homeowners temporary respite from their creditors? These would be less a revolution than an ill-advised band-aid on a broken-down system.

With the 99%er’s intense fixation on the 1%, they fail to realize that destiny lies in their own hands. Technology and the continuing rise of sophisticated collaborative consumption models empowers “the rest of us” to transact almost exclusively with each other, removing the corporation as middle man and barrier. I believe the 99% can reach that perfect equilibrium (and a considerably more even playing field) by embracing these new platforms.

After all, why fight ‘em if you can just forget ‘em?

ProFounder and Kickstarter to take the place of overbearing Venture Capitalists and obscene bank rates.

Skillshare to take the place of a Higher Ed. system with tuition that has increased 400% since 1985, blowing inflation out of the water.

AirBnB to take the place of a massively inefficient hotel system, run by a few major chains and plagued by empty paved no-man’s lands aside interstates across the United States.

The list goes on, with a common theme: there are options, whether they’ve been built yet or not. Given everything I’ve read and seen over the past year, I can’t help but think that these two movements are reaching their respective climaxes simultaneously for a reason. The real question: how to get the message to the folks in Zuccotti Park.

Cross Country Moves: Joining @Rentcycle in San Francisco

18 days ago, I spoke to Tim Hyer for the first time.

16 days ago, I decided to leave Colorado behind for California.

14 days ago, I packed up and hit the road.

12 days ago, I arrived.

10 days ago, I started work at Rentcycle.

It’s been a wild ride.

We’re working hard to make renting things easy. Amazon, Zappo’s, and Buy.com created e-commerce for the masses: a streamlined system for finding and purchasing items online. Constant innovation and iteration have led us to a point where it’s now easier to buy stuff online, than offline.

Rentcycle is doing the same for rentals. Currently, the industry’s online presence is disorganized and inefficient. A homeowner looking to rent a power drill is stuck in the yellow page days: calling around to local stores for availability and pricing. When Amazon offers one-click checkout and free 2 day shipping for new purchases, this time burden is a huge barrier to entry for renting.

Soon, renting things will be just as easy. Availability, price, location, reviews, all in one place, with a quick and painless reservation and checkout process. No more phone calls for quotes on skis, tuxes, backhoes, bouncy castles.

So I’ve gone all in, and moved to San Francisco. I couchsurfed, commuted at 4:45 AM, and dipped into hotel points as I frantically searched for an apartment (a real mission in this city). I exchanged the known in Colorado for the unknown in California, and it’s scary.

It’s a leap. The hours are long. The work is hard. But I’m excited to be adding value to a platform with such amazing transformative potential, surrounded by an incredibly smart group of people who teach me new things each day. I’ll leave you with our mission statement. We’re busting our asses to accomplish the following:

“To elevate the way society consumes by spearheading the shift from ownership to usership. To inspire a community of sharing that reduces production, reuses what we already have, and makes the world a less cluttered place to live.”

Taking Learning Back for the People: Skillshare in Boulder

Fact #1: Boulder has the most PhDs, per capita, of any city in the United States.

Fact #2: The majority of these PhDs don’t teach at CU Boulder. They work, live, and play off the Hill.

Fact #3: Degrees granted by institutions are a great metric of communal knowledge, but they represent just one facet of our collective IQ; we’re also blessed with amazing creative types, including musicians, artists, and craftsmen.

We have an extraordinarily deep pool of intelligence nestled at the base of the Flatirons. A few times a year, we attend awesome events like Ignite and TEDxBoulder—annual highlights for many folks around town. It’s great to come together and listen to smart people share ideas.

And yet, no system exists to effectively organize the transfer of this knowledge within the community on a day to day basis.

Until now. Because, with your help, Skillshare is coming to Boulder. Skillshare is a community marketplace for offline classes. The premise is simple: “Learn anything from anyone”.

Check out a selection of the classes currently on offer in NYC:

Be One of the Cool Kids: An Introduction to Ruby on Rails

Hacking the Human Body: Greater Results in Less Time

How to Get a Job at a Startup

Superstars like Dave Tisch (NYC Techstars) and Chris Dixon (Founder’s Collective) have already taught Skillshare classes in New York. I’m hoping the smartest people in the Boulder startup community (and beyond!) will step up as well.

To “launch” Skillshare in Boulder, we need another ~395 people to sign up. It would kick some serious ass if we unlocked our town of 50k full-time residents before big cities like DC, Boston, and LA. Take a second and do your part.

Recap: @BeUnreasonable Institute Crushes My First #BDNT

My first Boulder Denver New Tech! Amazing!

The July 12, 2011 edition of BDNT featured speakers from The Unreasonable Institute, along with local favorite BumperTunes. I was really, really stoked on the international group of innovators that talked about their Unreasonable projects.

Unreasonable reminds me why I moved to Boulder. It shows a complete lack of fear for the unknown. And that’s badass.

On to the presentations:

BumperTunes:

Platform connecting musicians and their original music (jingles??) with content producers who need audio for commercials, podcasts, etc.

I was really impressed by Kit’s candidness. “It felt awesome to get money from a customer we didn’t know”. “We built the whole CMS on WordPress”. “Just get it out there”. These are things you read about in books and blogs of successful entrepreneurs, but don’t always hear broadcasted to an audience of 400. A ton of potential—maybe look at putting the payment plan on a scale to accommodate different skill/experience among musicians?

Cycle Chalao:

Bicycle sharing system in Mumbai.

My favorite presentation of the night; I’ve got a weakness for bicycles and Raj was hilarious.In Boulder, bCycle is convenient. In Mumbai, it could change lives. Awesome.

InVenture:

Microfinance platform that allows lenders to re-invest in specific projects.

Microfinance (at reasonable borrowing rates) is mostly cool with me, but I think part of this presentation went over my head. Different from Kiva, yet also partnered with Kiva? Couldn’t see the distinction. There was also some skepticism from a questioner about the for-profit model, but if that means InVenture won’t be harrassing people on the Pearl Street Mall for donations, I’m all for it. =)

BioSense Technologies:

Anemia testing technology that doesn’t require a blood prick.

Another great presenter (the two Indian dudes knocked it out of the park). Compelling, simple solution to what’s obviously a huge problem. I think the model is also applicable to tons of other diseases/conditions in the developing world.

CalSolAgua:

More efficient solar water heaters for the developing world

From a dollars and cents perspective, I think this has the most potential of any presentation. They’re tapping into an enormous (and obviously growing) market, with a superior product (at least to the untrained eye). Having spent a month in Guatemala last year and risked similar genital-electrification (gentrification??), I can testify that it addresses a pressing need.

DayOne Response:

Cheap effective water filters for disaster response

Immediately grabbed my attention: “what the hell is that huge camelbak?” As a New Orleanian, this one resonated. If America can’t solve water-supply issues in its own backyard, obviously something disruptive needs to happen to provide water after disasters in places like Haiti, Africa, etc. I dug Robert Reich’s suggestion of a TOMs model: when an outdoorsman in the States buys a filtering system, one is donated to an NGO working in the developing world.

To sum it up:

I don’t know much about the genesis of The Unreasonable Institute, but I picture a powerful blend of quiet humility and dogged determination to build something great. It’s humble: by the very definition of its mission the Institute promotes the advancement of others. And yet, it’s great for the same reason: each successfully incubated startup builds up the reputation and brand. That’s a pretty amazing, self-sustaining loop, especially when you think about the scale of the startups above: one homerun could change the lives of millions.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.